Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


LGBTQ+ population at more risk to environmental challenges due to social, economic, health inequities

What has received less attention is how this discrimination puts the LGBTQ+ disproportionately at risk to environmental exposures — and, in particular, how these challenges intersect with issues of public health.

Photo by Nick Fewings from

Discrimination of the LGBTQ+ community is well documented, though the public discourse tends to focus on interpersonal acts of bigotry and legislative debates. What has received less attention, however, is how this discrimination puts the LGBTQ+ disproportionately at risk to environmental exposures — and, in particular, how these challenges intersect with issues of public health.

In a recent paper published in the American Journal of Public Health, Michelle Bell, Mary E. Pinchot Professor of Environmental Health at Yale, and Leo Goldsmith ’20 MEM, who worked  in Bell’s lab while at YSE, lay out the unequal environmental burden that the LGBTQ+ community faces and the ways in which the environmental justice movement can be more inclusive.

“The LGBTQ+ population is at more risk to environmental challenges because, just like many other marginalized populations, they face social, economic, and health inequities and disparities,” says Goldsmith. “The resilience of LGBTQ+ populations can also be affected as they are less likely to be able to access necessary resources, aid, and health care due to structural policies.”

According to the Center of American Progress, Goldsmith says, more than 1 in 3 LGBTQ+ persons faced discrimination of some kind during 2020, including more than 3 in 5 transgender people. This discrimination is seen most starkly in their access to employment, housing, and health care, but also their mental health and safety.

This discrimination, the authors say, reduces the LGBTQ+ community’s capacity to respond to environmental harm. Much like social determinants of health have been shown to be associated with unequal harmful environmental exposure based on race and socioeconomic status, chronic diseases associated with environmental exposure — respiratory diseases, cardiovascular diseases and cancer, for example — are found at a higher rate in the LGBTQ+ community than in cisgender, heterosexual populations.

The paper outlines specific recommendations, including: implementation of a system to collect sexual orientation and gender identity data nationally and locally; anti-discriminatory policies within health care and the federal government; policies to aid the ability of transgender and non-binary individuals to obtain appropriate identification documents; and the incorporation of LGBTQ+ issues into environmental justice research and organizations.

“There has been a start to addressing LGBTQ+ issues within the environmental justice movement with an intersectional environmental justice social media campaign meant to educate those on the issue,” says Goldsmith, who is Latinx and identifies as queer and transgender. “However, LGBTQ+ populations need to become a focal point of the environmental justice movement and academics to fully capture the impact from environmental injustices and the needs of those who are Black, Latinx, indigenous, low-income, and/or identify as LGBTQ+.”

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Like Us On Facebook



Referring to gender fluidity as “a concession to the age-old temptation to make oneself God”, the Vatican released an updated declaration of what the...


In the US, over one-quarter (26%) of people now identify as “religiously unaffiliated”, with the number growing over the last decade, so that it...


9.2% of the women reported perceived gender discrimination, most commonly situations where they were treated with less respect or courtesy. Overall, those who perceived...


Majority of Americans still support LGBTQIA rights and protections, particularly in housing, employment, and public accommodation, but the number of supporters has gone down....