Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

NEWSMAKERS

Characters’ actions in movie scripts reflect gender stereotypes – study

Female characters tend to display less agency than male characters, and that female characters are more likely to show affection. Male characters are less likely to “sob” or “cry,” and female characters are more likely to be subjected to “gawking” or “watching” by other characters, highlighting an emphasis on female appearance.

Movies, TV shows, and other media consistently portray traditional gender stereotypes, some of which may be harmful. To deepen understanding of this issue, some researchers explored the use of computational frameworks as an efficient and accurate way to analyze large amounts of character dialogue in scripts. However, some harmful stereotypes might be communicated not through what characters say, but through their actions.

A research therefore developed a novel machine-learning framework that uses scene descriptions in movie scripts to automatically recognize different characters’ actions. And applying the framework to hundreds of movie scripts showed that these actions tend to reflect widespread gender stereotypes, some of which were found to be consistent across time.

The research – “Boys don’t cry (or kiss or dance): A computational linguistic lens into gendered actions in film” by Victor Martinez, et al – appeared in PLoS ONE.

After exploring how characters’ actions might reflect stereotypes, Martinez and colleagues analyzed over 1.2 million scene descriptions from 912 movie scripts produced from 1909 to 2013, identifying 50,000 actions performed by twenty thousand characters.

Next, they conducted statistical analyses to examine whether there were differences between the types of actions performed by characters of different genders. These analyses identified a number of differences that reflect known gender stereotypes.

For instance, they found that female characters tend to display less agency than male characters, and that female characters are more likely to show affection. Male characters are less likely to “sob” or “cry,” and female characters are more likely to be subjected to “gawking” or “watching” by other characters, highlighting an emphasis on female appearance.

While the researchers’ model is limited by the extent of its ability to fully capture nuanced societal context relating the script to each scene and the overall narrative, these findings align with prior research on gender stereotypes in popular media, and could help raise awareness of how media might perpetuate harmful stereotypes and thereby influence people’s real-life beliefs and actions. In the future, the new machine-learning framework could be refined and applied to incorporate notions of intersectionality such as between gender, age, and race, to deepen understanding of this issue

The authors add: “Researchers have proposed using machine-learning methods to identify stereotypes in character dialogues in media, but these methods do not account for harmful stereotypes communicated through character actions. To address this issue, we developed a large-scale machine-learning framework that can identify character actions from movie script descriptions. By collecting 1.2 million scene descriptions from 912 movie scripts, we were able to study systematic gender differences in movie portrayals at a large scale.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Like Us On Facebook

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

NEWSMAKERS

People tend to discriminate in favor of individuals who show a similarity to them, even when the similarity arises from a random event like...

NEWSMAKERS

More comprehensive employment benefits and targeted actions that pay particular attention to the social and environmental dimensions of unemployment are needed to address the...

NEWSMAKERS

When men express passion for their work, they are perceived as more diligent and committed, increasing their likelihood of being seen as future leaders....

NEWSMAKERS

Movies with female-dominated casts were found to have a 149% higher magnitude of hostile sexism and a 44% higher magnitude of benevolent sexism than...

Advertisement